The value of lurking – another research idea for the indicators project

The question of the value of lurking is a common one for learning and teaching. Is it okay for students to simply sit quietly and listen, especially in an online forum? Should we “force” them to participate?

I’m currently reading Saba (2000) as a ploy to generate more insight into “what is research”. Saba (2000) has a section titled “Theory-based research”, which summarises some of the research done in distance education. The first cab off the rank is Fulford and Zhang (1993) and this research seems to suggest one answer to the question of lurking.

Learners’ perception of learning

Saba’s (2000) description of their research is that it studied the perception learners’ had of interaction. The conclusion was that such perception was a critical indicator of satisfaction. Saba quotes

overall interaction dynamics may have a stronger impact on learners’ satisfaction than strictly personal participation. Vicarious interaction may result in greater learner satisfaction than would the divided attention necessary to ensure the overt engagement of each participant

The recommendation then is to design teaching so as to increase the learners perception of overall interaction.

That sounds like to me as offering an answer to the lurking question. There is some benefit to lurking if through lurking the learner perception of the level of interaction increases.

The indicators project

The indicators project seeks to mine the usage data of LMSes to identify useful patterns. SNAPP is a project looking at generating “maps” of student interaction within discussion forums.

Combining these with some other methods would seem to be a good way to test these findings. Especially given the evolution of distance education since 1993.

Should probably start with the other literature. According to Google Scholar Fulford and Zhang have been referenced almost 300 times. Should be some interesting stuff in there.

Beaudoin (2002) might be a good place to start, from the abstract

The data shows that these students do, in fact, spend a significant amount of time in learning related tasks, including logging on, even when not visibly participating, and they feel they are still learning and benefiting from this low profile approach to their online studies. However, preliminary analyses of course grades indicate that the mean grade is slightly better for high visibility learners than for no visibility learners. Findings suggest that further research in the area of the so-called invisible learner is a critical area of investigation to better understand the dynamics of asynchronous learning and teaching.

Looking at the invisible learner might be interesting.

References

Beaudoin, M. (2002). “Learning or lurking?: Tracking the “invisible” online student.” The Internet and Higher Education 5(2): 147-155.

Fulford, C. P., & Zhang, S. (1993). Perception of interaction: The critical predictor in distance education. The American Journal of Distance Education, 7(3), 8-21.

Saba, F. (2000). “Research in distance education: A status report.” International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning 1(1).

2 thoughts on “The value of lurking – another research idea for the indicators project

  1. beerc

    With regard to the Indicators, there is a correlation between the number of discussion forum reads and student results. Additionally, there is an increase in discussion forum engagement by students when teachers are actively participating in the forums. Based on these and other observations, I suspect that the value of LMS discussion forums to students is twofold. Firstly it is a place where they can request and receive information. Secondly, it appears to provide some sort of link to student motivation and engagement even when the informational value of the forum is low.

    http://beerc.wordpress.com/2009/11/24/who-thinks-staff-particpation-in-lms-discussion-forums-is-important/

    http://beerc.wordpress.com/2010/03/09/online-student-engagement/

    1. G’day Col,

      I know about the both those correlations. The question is whether there is more to it.

      Not everyone wants to, or even can, get a HD. Some students are happy with a D, C or even a P. In some cases a student may also be happy with a F as there may be some contextual reason why they failed, but they might be happy with the course.

      That staff participation in the forums increases participation is seems evident and good.

      But there’s more. For example

      • A course that has content regularly updated during the term might given the impression of greater interaction/responsiveness on the part of staff and hence make students happier.
      • The students that don’t participate in a forum where there is lots of staff engagement may be happier because of the greater interaction, even if they don’t get a HD. They might also get a better grade where there is more interaction.

      There’s a few more, but you get the idea.

      David.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s