PhD Thesis

After starting in 2001 and suffering many delays along the way, my PhD thesis titled – “An Information Systems Design Theory for E-Learning” – was finally submitted to and accepted by ANU. The abstract is included below and a PDF copy (5Mb) of the thesis can be downloaded.

A copy is also available on the ANU Digital Theses Collection.

Abstract

This thesis seeks to offer an answer to the problem of how to design, implement and support information systems that effectively and efficiently support e-learning within universities. This problem is increasingly prevalent and important to the operation of universities. It is also a problem where existing solutions are limited in terms of variety, quality and explicit theoretical guidance. This thesis formulates a specific Information Systems Design Theory (ISDT) – An Information Systems Design Theory for Emergent University E-learning Systems – as one answer to this problem.

The ISDT is formulated using an iterative action research cycle that encompasses the design, support and evolution of the Webfuse information system at Central Queensland University (CQU) from 1996 through 2009. The Webfuse system was used by tens of thousands of staff and students. It is the knowledge gained through this experience that, in two separate stages, is used to formulate design theory.

The final ISDT recognises that diversity and rapid on-going change are for a number of reasons, the key characteristics of e-learning within universities. Consequently, the ISDT specifies both process and product models that aim to enable the e-learning information systems to be emergent. In particular the ISDT proposes that emergent e-learning information systems will encourage and enable greater levels of e-learning adoption in terms of quantity, quality and diversity; as well as providing a level of differentiation and competitive advantage for the institution.

This thesis makes two additional contributions. First, the Ps Framework is developed and used to analyse the current, dominant practice of providing e-learning information systems within universities. The resulting analysis reveals a significant mismatch between the requirements of e-learning within universities and the characteristics of the product and process models used by the dominant approach to supporting e-learning within universities. It is this mismatch that the ISDT seeks to address. Second, is the formulation of an alternate method for specifying the components of an ISDT. This alternate specification arose from difficulties faced with using existing ISDT specifications.

Background

The origins of the thesis are in work at CQUniversity in the design, development and support of Webfuse a system to support e-learning. The early design thinking behind Webfuse is outlined in a 1996 ASCILITE paper The design of an integrated, online learning environment

A more recent presentation gives a summary of what I think is wrong with existing e-learning practice within higher education and the suggestions that have arisen from my research. The presentation page has a range of resources including video. It is wrapped around with a brief experiment with technology for presentations, ignore that.

Summary

At the moment, it looks like the thesis will claim that the implementation of e-learning within universities is currently constrained by an orthodoxy. Using the Ps Framework the thesis will illustrate that the orthodoxy significantly constrains effectiveness, innovation and perhaps efficiency by adopting conceptualisations of the Product (e-learning = a Learning Management System), Process (teleological design), People (that we’re rational), Place (very much informed by simplistic versions of “business”), amongst others.

Based on this premise, ideas from the literature and the experience of designing, developing and supporting Webfuse over 10+years the thesis proposes an Information Systems Design Theory (Gregor and Jones, 2007) that offers an alternate approach. This alternate approach is based around an ateleological design process and a “product” that focuses “fusing” together best of breed technologies into the specifics of the institutional context (“Place”). It is suggested, that such an approach is more likely to increase innovation, increase adoption of effective pedagogies and, in the long term, be more efficient than current practices.

Now all I have to do is write the thesis and justify all of that.

Other resources, that expand on the above include:

Aims

This thesis aims to be a demonstration of the ability identified by Alavi and Leidner (2001) in that it seeks to offer a vision on the structures, processes and technology that can be drawn upon to effectively implement technology-mediated learning within universities. The specific aim of this thesis is to provide one answer to the following research problem.

How do you design, implement and support an information system that effectively and efficiently supports e-learning within an institution of higher education?

One approach to this problem has been generated through the application of an iterative, action-research process to the implementation and support of an information system to support e-learning within an existing HEI. The resulting real-world information systems has been used by thousands of staff and students and has informed the formulation of three generations of an Information Systems Design Theory (Gregor and Jones, 2007; Walls, Widmeyer, & El Sawy, 2004; Walls et al., 1992).

The intent is that the resulting ISDT provides guidance that is “better” than much of the existing practice.

Outputs

The major outputs of the thesis includes:

  • Webfuse – an information system still being used at CQUniversity.
    A system that, at last count (late 2005), had been used by 12000+ students, and 400+ staff.
  • Publications describing Webfuse and its design
  • Publications around e-learning and the use of IT in tertiary education.
    The distinction between publications in this category and the previous category is somewhat blurred.
  • Publications contributing to the practice of design research within information systems.

My publications page contains pointers to the papers.

81 thoughts on “PhD Thesis

  1. Pingback: The Ps Framework - avoiding perceptual blindness? « The Weblog of (a) David Jones

  2. Pingback: Readings on Design-based research « The Weblog of (a) David Jones

  3. Pingback: Kant - separation of reason and experience « The Weblog of (a) David Jones

  4. Pingback: Information Systems Epistemology: An Historical Perspective « The Weblog of (a) David Jones

  5. Pingback: Webfuse usage statistics - Quizzes « The Weblog of (a) David Jones

  6. Pingback: Reflections and Implications from Webfuse - Domain languages « The Weblog of (a) David Jones

  7. Pingback: Open source learning management systems - the latest fad in e-learning « The Weblog of (a) David Jones

  8. Pingback: The “dominant” and problem assumptions underlying university-based e-learning - introduction « The Weblog of (a) David Jones

  9. Pingback: Alternatives for the institutional implementation of e-learning: Lessons from 13 years of Webfuse « The Weblog of (a) David Jones

  10. Pingback: An information systems design theory for e-learning « The Weblog of (a) David Jones

  11. Pingback: “An ISDT for e-learning” - Audio is now synchronized « The Weblog of (a) David Jones

  12. Pingback: Branding and universities - a mismatch of purpose and place? « The Weblog of (a) David Jones

  13. Pingback: Task corruption in teaching @ university - negative impact of Place? « The Weblog of (a) David Jones

  14. Pingback: Place - the industrial society’s impact on schools - and universities? « The Weblog of (a) David Jones

  15. Pingback: Comparing VLEs/LMS to the past: flaws and implications for development models « The Weblog of (a) David Jones

  16. Pingback: “Blame the teacher” and its negative impact on learning and e-learning « The Weblog of (a) David Jones

  17. Pingback: The Ps framework « The Weblog of (a) David Jones

  18. Pingback: Technology will *not* change the way we teach - an example why we’re an amnesiac field « The Weblog of (a) David Jones

  19. Pingback: “One ring to rule them all”: Limitations and implications of the LMS/VLE product model « The Weblog of (a) David Jones

  20. Pingback: Implementing an institution-wide learning and teaching strategy: lessons in managing change « The Weblog of (a) David Jones

  21. Pingback: Birnbaum’s fad cycle in higher education « The Weblog of (a) David Jones

  22. Pingback: A history of technology-mediated learning « The Weblog of (a) David Jones

  23. Pingback: The paradigms of e-learning « The Weblog of (a) David Jones

  24. Pingback: E-learning usage - quality « The Weblog of (a) David Jones

  25. Pingback: Usage of e-learning - quantity « The Weblog of (a) David Jones

  26. Pingback: Lessons for e-learning « The Weblog of (a) David Jones

  27. Pingback: Integration with professional lives of academics - why industrial e-learning fails and why post-industrial might work « The Weblog of (a) David Jones

  28. Pingback: Place - component of the Ps Framework « The Weblog of (a) David Jones

  29. Pingback: Society – an aspect of Place impacting on e-learning « The Weblog of (a) David Jones

  30. Pingback: Institution – another part of place « The Weblog of (a) David Jones

  31. Pingback: Lessons from place « The Weblog of (a) David Jones

  32. Pingback: Purpose – a component of the Ps Framework « The Weblog of (a) David Jones

  33. Pingback: What are the conditions that are conducive to the creation of a variety of new ideas? « The Weblog of (a) David Jones

  34. Pingback: The LMS/VLE as a one word language – metaphor and e-learning « The Weblog of (a) David Jones

  35. Pingback: Teleological design – definition and weaknesses « The Weblog of (a) David Jones

  36. Pingback: Ateleological processes – definition and weaknesses « The Weblog of (a) David Jones

  37. Pingback: The teaching/research nexus – an example? « The Weblog of (a) David Jones

  38. Pingback: Institutional e-learning strategies « The Weblog of (a) David Jones

  39. Pingback: Learning and teaching processes « The Weblog of (a) David Jones

  40. Pingback: Lessons from process for university e-learning « The Weblog of (a) David Jones

  41. Pingback: Confirmation bias, the Tolstoy Syndrome and pattern entrainment « The Weblog of (a) David Jones

  42. Pingback: Students and e-learning – a start to the People section « The Weblog of (a) David Jones

  43. Pingback: Occupational stress in Australian University Staff « The Weblog of (a) David Jones

  44. Pingback: Leaders and managers – the next bit of People « The Weblog of (a) David Jones

  45. Pingback: Thinking about evaluating Webfuse (1996 through 1999) – evaluation of an LMS? « The Weblog of (a) David Jones

  46. Pingback: How do you measure success with institutional use of an LMS/VLE? « The Weblog of (a) David Jones

  47. Pingback: Breadth of Webfuse use: 1997 through 2009 « The Weblog of (a) David Jones

  48. Pingback: Support staff – continuing with the People component « The Weblog of (a) David Jones

  49. Pingback: The chasm « The Weblog of (a) David Jones

  50. Pingback: People, cognition, rationality and e-learning « The Weblog of (a) David Jones

  51. Pingback: Lessons for e-learning from people « The Weblog of (a) David Jones

  52. Pingback: What is an LMS? « The Weblog of (a) David Jones

  53. Pingback: Procurement and software: alternate models for e-learning « The Weblog of (a) David Jones

  54. Pingback: Lessons from product for e-learning « The Weblog of (a) David Jones

  55. Pingback: Getting started with CCK09 « The Weblog of (a) David Jones

  56. Pingback: Thoughts on “Insidiuous pedagogy” « The Weblog of (a) David Jones

  57. Pingback: Blog de tesis, por David Jones « Estelaripa's Blog

  58. Pingback: Two types of process and what university e-learning continues to get wrong « The Weblog of (a) David Jones

  59. Pingback: Emergent and agile development « The Weblog of (a) David Jones

  60. Pingback: Default course sites and wizards « The Weblog of (a) David Jones

  61. Pingback: Workarounds « The Weblog of (a) David Jones

  62. Pingback: Some rough Webfuse usage statistics – 2001 through 2009 « The Weblog of (a) David Jones

  63. Pingback: Flexible and support diversity « The Weblog of (a) David Jones

  64. Pingback: Webfuse as a web publishing tool – 2000 through 2004 « The Weblog of (a) David Jones

  65. Pingback: Default course sites and wizards – version 2.0 « The Weblog of (a) David Jones

  66. Pingback: An integrated OLE « The Weblog of (a) David Jones

  67. Pingback: The product component of the Ps Framework « The Weblog of (a) David Jones

  68. Pingback: Examining feature adoption – slightly better approach « The Weblog of (a) David Jones

  69. Pingback: The VLE model and the wrong level of abstraction « The Weblog of (a) David Jones

  70. Pingback: Features used in Webfuse course sites « The Weblog of (a) David Jones

  71. Pingback: Web 2.0 no meu Diigo (weekly) « Web 2.0 PT

  72. Pingback: Some stories from teaching awards « The Weblog of (a) David Jones

  73. Pingback: A little bim2 status and planning « The Weblog of (a) David Jones

  74. Pingback: Reflections on a 12 year-old course site – It would be harder now « The Weblog of (a) David Jones

  75. Pingback: And the thesis is complete, what’s next? « The Weblog of (a) David Jones

  76. Pingback: Mind the gap – a big problem with institutional e-learning « The Weblog of (a) David Jones

  77. Pingback: Introducing the alternative « The Weblog of (a) David Jones

  78. Pingback: The illusion we understand the past fosters overconfidence in our ability to predict the future « The Weblog of (a) David Jones

  79. Pingback: #ascilite2012 technical support and the tail wagging the dog « The Weblog of (a) David Jones

  80. Pingback: Meaningless freedom and auto-marking the learning journals | The Weblog of (a) David Jones

  81. Pingback: The network challenge to the LMS mindset | The Weblog of (a) David Jones

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s